0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹ÝÁöÂø¿ëÀÌ ¼Õ¾Ä±â ÈÄÀÇ ¹Ì»ý¹° ¼ö¿Í À¯Çü¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

The Number and Type of Microorganisms on the Ring Finger after Handwashing

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 5±Ç 1È£ p.143 ~ 154
KMID : 0388319980050010143
Á¤Àμ÷/Ihn Sook Jeong

Abstract

°á ·Ð
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¹ÝÁö Âø¿ëÀÌ ¼Õ¾Ä±â ÈÄÀÇ ¹Ì»ý¹° ¼ö¿Í À¯Çü¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀÏÄ¡µÈ ÀÇ°ß
ÀÌ ¾øÀ¸¸ç ¿¬±¸°¡ Á¦ÇѵǾî ÀÖ¾î ºñ´©¿Í º£Å¸µòÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÏ¹Ý ¼Õ¾Ä±â¸¦ ÇÑ ÈÄ ¹ÝÁö Âø¿ë¿©
ºÎ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹Ì»ý¹° ¼ö¿Í À¯ÇüÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ¿© ½ÇÁ¦ °£È£´ÜÀ§¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ°íÀÚ 1996³â 11¿ù 2ÀÏ¿¡¼­
1996³â 11¿ù 24ÀÏ »çÀÌ¿¡ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù.
¿¬±¸´ë»óÀº S´ëÇк´¿ø ³»°ú°è¿Í ¿Ü°ú°è ÁßȯÀڽǿ¡ ±Ù¹«ÇÏ´Â °£È£»ç·Î ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¢°í ÀÖ´Â
15¸í(ÃÖÁ¾ ºÐ¼®Àº 10¸í)À̾ú´Ù. °Ëü¼öÁýÀº µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ´ë»ó¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¼Õ¾Ä±âÀü, ºñ´©·Î ¼Õ¾ÄÀº ÈÄ,
º£Å¸µòÀ¸·Î ¼Õ¾ÄÀº ÈÄ µîÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¤ ¼Õ°¡¶ô°ú ±×·¸Áö ¾ÊÀº ¼Õ°¡¶ôÀ» ¸ê±Õ¸éºÀ
À¸·Î swabÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¿¬±¸°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°¾Ò´Ù.
1. 10¸íÀÇ ´ë»óÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¹è¾çµÈ ÃÑ ¹Ì»ý¹°¼ö´Â 938CFU/0.1§¦À̸ç ÀÌ Áß 83.8%´Â ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¤
°æ¿ìÀÌ¸ç ³ª¸ÓÁö´Â ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¢Áö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ» ¶§·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖÀ½À» º¸¿´´Ù.
2. ¼Õ¾Ä±â À¯Çüº°, ¹ÝÁö Âø¿ë ¿©ºÎº° ¹Ì»ý¹° ¼ö¸¦ º¸¸é ¼Õ¾Ä±â¸¦ ÇÑ ÈÄ¿¡´Â ¹Ì»ý¹° ¼ö°¡ ±Þ
°ÝÈ÷ °¨¼ÒµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¢Áö ¾ÊÀº °æ¿ìÀÇ °¨¼ÒÆøÀÌ ´õ ÄÇ´Ù.
3. ºñ´©·Î ¼Õ¾Ä±â¸¦ ÇÑ °æ¿ì °¨¼ÒÀ²ÀÌ 48.8%, ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ±ä °æ¿ì 38.8%, ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¢Áö ¾ÊÀº °æ
¿ì 83.7% ¿´´Ù. º£´Ùµò ¼Òµ¶Á¦¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì ÀüüÀûÀÎ °¨¼ÒÀ²Àº 88.2%, ¹ÝÁö Âø¿ë¿¡ µû¶ó
°¢°¢ 86.9%¿Í 92.7%¿´´Ù.
4. ¹ÝÁöÀÇ ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¶ó¼­´Â ´Ü¼øÇü ¹ÝÁö°¡ ÃÑ ´ë»óÀÚÀÇ 60%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â ¹Ý¸é ¹Ì»ý¹°¼ö´Â
73%(684CFU/0.1§¦)·Î º¹ÇÕÇü ¹ÝÁö¿¡ ºñÇØ ¹Ì»ý¹°¼ö°¡ ´õ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °æÇâÀº ºñ´©
·Î ¼Õ¾Ä±â¸¦ ÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ µÎµå·¯Á³´Ù.
5. ¹ÝÁöÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ º£Å¸µòÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼Õ¾Ä±â¸¦ ÇÑ °æ¿ì ±Õ°¨¼ÒÀ²ÀÌ °¡Àå ÄÇÀ¸¸ç,
´Ü¼øÇüÀº 84.9%, º¹ÇÕÇüÀº 93.5%¿´´Ù.
6. ¹ÝÁöÀÇ ÇüÅ¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¢Áö ¾ÊÀº °æ¿ì ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¤ °æ¿ì¿¡ ºñÇØ ¼Õ¾Ä±âÈÄÀÇ ¹Ì
»ý¹° °¨¼ÒÀ²ÀÌ ´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
7, ºÐ¸®µÈ ¹Ì»ý¹°Àº ¼Õ¿¡ ÈçÈ÷ »óÁÖÇÏ´Â ±×¶÷¾ç¼º±ÕÀÌ ´ëºÎºÐÀ» Â÷ÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·Î ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¢´Â °æ¿ì¿Í ±×·¸Áö ¾ÊÀº °æ¿ì ¹Ì»ý¹°ÀÇ À¯Çü¿¡´Â Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾øÁö¸¸ ±×
±Õ°¨¼ÒÀ²¿¡¼­´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ¸ç, ƯÈ÷ ¼Òµ¶Á¦°¡ Æ÷ÇÔµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ºñ´©·Î¸¸ ¼Õ¾Ä±â¸¦
ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì °¨¼ÒÀ²ÀÌ Å©°Ô ´Þ¶óÁüÀ» º¼ ¶§ ÁßȯÀÚ½ÇÀ» ¹°·Ð ÀϹݺ´½Ç¿¡¼­ ±Ù¹«ÇÏ´Â °£È£»çÀÇ
°æ¿ì ¹ÝÁö¸¦ ³¢Áö ¾Êµµ·Ï ±ÇÀåÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Background : There haute been very few studies conducted on the number and type of
microorganisms that remain on the ring finger after handwashing. This study was
performed to investigate whether there were changes and differences In the type and
number of microorganisms on the ring finger before and after handwashing.
Method : The subjects of the study were 15 MICU and SICU staff nurses who were
wearing rings. I swabbed two different fingers of the same hand with cotton balls. One
finger which had a ring and the other with no ring. I swabbed the fingers of each
subject three times (before handwashing, after hendwashing with soap, and after
handwashing with bethadine solution). After storing them for 48 hours in an incubator, I
sent them to the laboratory and recorded the culture results.
Results : There was no difference in the type of microorganism, but a major differ
once in the number of the microorganisms that existed on the finger ring. The results
showed that there were much more microorganisms on the ring fingers than on the
fingers that did not have rings both before and after handwashing. This tendency was
consistent regardless of the handwashing agent. I therefore recommend that all nursing
staff who work in general nursing units, as well as nurses who work in the ICU,
remove their rings when taking care of the patients.

KeyWords
¹ÝÁöÂø¿ë, ¼Õ¾Ä±â, ¹Ì»ý¹°¼ö, Ring-wearing, Handwashing, Number of microorganism,
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed